Reeves, K (2002) Construction business systems in Japan: General contractors and subcontractors. Building Research & Information, 30(6), pp. 413-424. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The Japanese construction sector is characterized by the predominance of large general contractors, with multiple layers of small contractors and subcontractors working under their umbrella. Against the background of huge construction demand created by modernization (starting in 1868) and the resultant changes in the construction business (building style, materials and project scale), large general contractors and subordinate subcontractors gradually created a distinctive contracting system. The development process of the construction business based on collaboration and not free competition is discussed with particular emphasis on the unique nature of the contracting system using historical- and institutional-based analyses. One of the competitive strengths of general contractors lies with project organization at construction sites. How the subcontracting of building projects is controlled by general contractors and how subcontractors respond to their subordinate position is explored. Current strengths, inefficiencies and problems of the construction business are identified and possible systemic reforms are suggested, such as the development of competent subcontractors to revitalize the Japanese construction industry along actions for contractors, subcontractors, private- and public-sector clients.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business systems; construction business system; contracting system; contractors; Japan; subcontractors |
| Index terms: | subcontractor, construction industry, construction sector, competition, construction demand, collaboration, project organization, Japan, subcontracting, public-sector client, general contractor, construction site |
| Subjects: | sociology, market analysis, industry analysis, management, organizational theory, Geography, work location, organization, practitioner |
| Topics: | Site Management, Organizational Design, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here