Environmental labelling of timber-framed dwellings and their building components

Stehn, L (2002) Environmental labelling of timber-framed dwellings and their building components. Building Research & Information, 30(4), pp. 248-254. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Demands by customers for environmentally better products produced under economically sound conditions are increasing steadily. Wood has a lower environmental impact than most of the competing materials used in the building sector. However, for reliable customer information, environmental impact verification methods for timber-frame houses are needed. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a forest certification scheme operating at a global level. It relies upon a performance-based standard that includes specific performance measures that can be used as a basis for product labelling; minimizing the environmental impact is covered by one of the FSC's ten principles. A case study of a customized timber-frame house illustrates the possibility of using the FSC percentage-based volume criteria as an environmental labelling, ensuring criteria that the wood products come from well-managed forests. The case study demonstrates not only the simplicity, but also the drawbacks of applying the FSC labelling to complex wood products such as houses, and an analysis of a proposed model gives insights into how the FSC labelling can be extended for houses by incorporating building functional and service-life criteria.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building components; environmental labelling; fsc labelling; functional requirements; performance-based standards; service life of components; Sweden; timber-frame houses; wood products
Index terms: certification, building component, performance-based, case study, environmental labelling, service life, Sweden, wood, forest, performance measure, environmental impact
Subjects: environmental science, architectural elements, environmental impact, asset management, administrative processes, performance measurement, data collection methods, traditional and composite building materials, sustainability assessment, Geography
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here