A plausible lightweight dirt model for application in real-time 3D environments

Aspin, R (2007) A plausible lightweight dirt model for application in real-time 3D environments. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(3), pp. 181-194. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Dirt is an important, if unattractive, feature of our real world, the presence of which provides key subliminal cues that enhance understanding of many factors including age, history, economic and social status. In addition, the accumulation of dirt may also aid in the perception of fine detail, on complex surfaces, by highlighting fine features. Because dirt is such an important factor in the manner in which we perceive the real world, its inclusion in 3D virtual environments should significantly increase the sense of presence a user experiences by creating a more plausible impression of the real world environment. Most traditional approaches for incorporating dirt into 3D environments rely on either highly complex, but accurate, simulations, or depend on artistic skill. This research seeks to identify an alternative approach, grounded in human perception, which evaluates simplified approximations of dirt aggregation with the aim of identifying an approximate model that presents a plausible representation of dirt. This paper describes the process by which such an approximation has been identified and evaluated, and presents surprising results as to the level of complexity such a model requires to be viable.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: dirt; simulation; virtual environments
Index terms: virtual environment, presence, history, complexity, user experience
Subjects: systems engineering, architectural and construction history, environmental science, user-centered design, virtual reality
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here