Du Plessis, C; Irurah, D K and Scholes, R J (2003) The built environment and climate change in South Africa. Building Research & Information, 31(3-4), pp. 240-256. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The demands of climate change are appraised in relation to the impacts on and contribution of the built environment in South Africa to climate change. These demands are situated within the broader South African developmental context. The current status and scope of national policy and strategy initiatives aimed, first, at mitigating the role of the built environment in climate change, and, second, at adapting current settlement and construction practices to projected climate change in the country are assessed. Suggestions are made for filling the identified gaps in policy development and research. The paper concludes that climate change is not a major item on the country's research and policy development agendas, and the country is reluctant to take responsibility for its own role in the crisis. Both adaptation and mitigation is happening in an ad hoc manner, often driven by pressures other than climate change, and the task of interweaving the demands of climate change into South Africa's settlement development policies is yet to be attempted in a focussed manner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; built environment; climate change; construction; efficiency; embodied energy; emissions; mitigation; public policy; South Africa |
| Index terms: | national policy, adaptation, strategy, efficiency, climate change, embodied energy, South Africa, public policy, built environment, mitigation |
| Subjects: | energy systems, public policy, climate science, user focus, infrastructure and transport systems, Geography, financial risk, management, performance management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here