Gibson Jr, G E and Gebken Ii, R J (2003) Design quality in pre-project planning: Applications of the project definition rating index. Building Research & Information, 31(5), pp. 346-356. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The development of the project scope definition package is one of the major tasks in the pre-project planning process. It is where risks associated with the project are analysed, early designs are formulated, critical decisions are made and the specific project execution approach is defined. However, early planning in many cases is not performed well in the building industry, and, as a result, the building sector suffers from poor or incomplete scope definition, frequently experiencing considerable changes that result in significant cost and schedule overruns. The Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) is a weighted score sheet used for determining the level of scope definition of building projects during pre-project planning. Developed by the Construction Industry Institute (CII) in 1999, this tool has been widely adopted by various owners and designers in the building industry. Using the PDRI while conducting planning charrettes (i.e. intense focus meetings involving key stakeholders) provides a collaborative environment that can enhance design quality during pre-project planning by integrating the perspectives of the various project participants. The background of the PDRI, its benefits for the project and use of the PDRI in planning charrettes, including key participants, required resources and outcomes, are assessed. Recommendations are provided for project professionals about the use of the charrette approach for planning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural programming; briefing; design quality; planning charrettes; pre-project planning; project definition rating index; scope definition |
| Index terms: | Construction Industry Institute, schedule overrun, designer, project scope definition, owner, design quality, package, project planning, briefing, programming, charrette, building industry |
| Subjects: | project controls, sociology, industry analysis, design process, contractual arrangements, professional practice, research organizations, profession, programming, scope management, control systems |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here