Marteinsson, B (2003) Durability and the factor method of ISO 15686-1. Building Research & Information, 31(6), pp. 416-426. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Interest in the service life of buildings and components and the future need for maintenance is growing, and the methodology for service life planning is starting to appear in standards. The standard ISO 15686 prescribes a factor methodology for deciding about the expected service life of a component with a prescribed probability of earlier failure. The methodology is based on extensive knowledge about materials and building technology, and examples of the use of this methodology on building components are of value for the discussion on service life planning. Results from a condition survey of timber windows are used to define the service life and effect of the factor method in the Standard. Wood is a very variable material, and for wooden windows maintenance plays a key role in the durability of the component. In this instance, condition assessment is, therefore, not sufficient to estimate the service life. Information about former maintenance and refurbishment is also needed. The results from a condition assessment and the house owner's answers to a questionnaire are combined to evaluate the estimated service life of the windows. The factors for the standardized method for estimating service life with a given confidence limit are shown to have a wide range in values that give considerable uncertainty to the practical use of the standardized methodology. For example, it is shown that the estimated service life with an 80% confidence limit is much lower than the average service life. Thus, the question is posed whether there is any meaning in estimating the lower limit of service life.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building inspection; building stock; components; condition assessment; durability; maintenance; performance; service life; whole life costs |
| Index terms: | whole life cost, survey, inspection, building stock, meaning, durability, owner, wood, building technology, service life, ISO, building component, estimating, estimate, questionnaire, methodology, window |
| Subjects: | material degradation and durability, financial and cost management, standards development, engineering systems, data collection methods, financial analysis, quality assurance, asset management, sociology, architectural elements, research methods, traditional and composite building materials |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here