Blong, R (2004) Residential building damage and natural perils: Australian examples and issues. Building Research & Information, 32(5), pp. 379-390. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The most important natural perils in Australia are tropical cyclones, earthquakes, bushfires, thunderstorms, floods, landslides and tsunamis. However, as far as residential buildings are concerned, the correct relative order of importance depends on the frames of reference used. Certainly, meteorological perils are more significant than geological hazards. Residential building damage produced by the most important natural hazards is assessed. Governance is shown to be poorly related to actual risk. Tropical cyclone wind-loading codes are amongst the best in the world, but the more limited potential for storm surge damage is largely ignored. While land-use regulations are strong in some states, almost no attention has been paid to appropriate building materials for flood-prone properties. Hail is probably the most important peril along the populated south-eastern seaboard, but no regulations govern roofing materials. Other issues relating to the present understanding of damage to buildings are raised.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; Australia; building codes; building damage; building stock; bushfires; earthquakes; floods; housing; land-use planning; risk management; thunderstorms; tropical cyclones; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | building code, building stock, loading, regulation, storm surge, natural hazard, building material, tropical cyclone, risk management, Australia, adaptation, earthquake, residential building, landslide, vulnerability, land, bushfire, tsunami, housing, roofing, governance |
| Subjects: | construction type, real estate economics, construction operations, political science, asset management, risk assessment, building materials, regulatory law, design practice, business, Geography, user focus, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Site Management, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here