Manfield, P; Ashmore, J and Corsellis, T (2004) Design of humanitarian tents for use in cold climates. Building Research & Information, 32(5), pp. 368-378. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Extreme climatic risks pose significant challenges to displaced populations that often lack adequate shelter. Contemporary policy documents concerning emergency shelter reveal that the scope of shelter-associated risk is much wider than simply exposure to the elements and includes a significant social dimension. However, disparity exists between implicitly accepted risks described in aid agency literature and field practice. Experience in recent disaster assistance programmes in Kosovo and Afghanistan illustrates how ill equipped the aid community is to deal with cold weather affecting transitional settlements. A review of the environmental risks associated with living in tented accommodation in cold climates reveals the difficulty of providing thermal comfort and fire safety in both heated and unheated tents. In addition, social surveys and field trials with displaced populations in Afghanistan illustrate that shelter is used, perceived and valued differently according to the ethnic and cultural background of occupants, and that these are also factors that impact on the risks they bear. Several design recommendations and guides for the use of cold climate relief tents are made, whilst acknowledging that the provision of alternative, longer-term shelter provision during the phase of emergency response is nearly always preferable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cold-climate shelter; disaster response; humanitarian aid; insulated; risk; shelter; shelter policy; sphere standards; tents; transitional settlement |
| Index terms: | emergency response, survey, programme, emergency shelter, humanitarian, disaster response, field trial, cold climate, Afghanistan, disparity, dimension, exposure, agency, cold weather, fire safety, environmental risk, population, thermal comfort, documents |
| Subjects: | demography, project controls, emergency and crisis management, sociology, social justice, environmental engineering, public and environmental health, safety engineering, health safety and environment, Geography, professional development, financial risk, principle, environmental science, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, construction type, climate science |
| Topics: | Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Ethics, Urban Studies, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here