Mantzouratos, N; Gardiklis, D; Dedoussis, V and Kerhoulas, P (2004) Concise exterior lighting simulation methodology. Building Research & Information, 32(1), pp. 42-47. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A methodology is proposed which integrates advanced photogrammetric and computer-aided design (CAD) software with lighting simulation tools. The methodology consists of preparing a CAD model from digital photographs and then using lighting simulation packages to carry out the lighting analysis and produce a photo-realistic image. The latter can serve as a decision tool to the lighting designer. The methodology was specifically adapted for illumination studies of buildings of historical and/or architectural importance. The methodology was validated quantitatively by comparing simulation results with on-site field luminance measurements. The rendered photo-realistic images produced also compared favourably with photographs indicating the reliability and effectiveness of the overall simulation procedure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building illumination; lighting; photogrammetric imaging; simulation |
| Index terms: | designer, package, simulation tool, computer aided design, effectiveness, methodology |
| Subjects: | performance management, research methods, profession, computational design, analytical methods, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here