Ofori, G and Kien, H L (2004) Translating Singapore architects' environmental awareness into decision making. Building Research & Information, 32(1), pp. 27-37. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Construction activity is known to have a major impact on the environment. Construction is a major consumer of a wide range of naturally occurring and synthesized resources. The extraction, processing and utilization of these resources can have various negative impacts on the environment. With increased awareness and knowledge of these impacts, efforts are being made to avoid these adverse effects. Among these is the selection and specification of appropriate materials. This paper studies the level of environmental awareness and knowledge of architects in Singapore when selecting and specifying materials during the design stage. Responses to a questionnaire indicate that the architects are aware of the environmental impacts of building materials, and knowledgeable about possible measures which could help avoid the problems. However, they are not adopting green design approaches. Key policy directions for government, professional bodies, educators and clients are made to enable Singapore architects to apply their knowledge of environmental issues in their design decisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; design process; environmental impact; green design; resource use; Singapore; specification |
| Index terms: | construction activity, Singapore, environmental issue, design process, specification, design decision, decision-making, environmental awareness, building material, architect, environmental impact, questionnaire, design stage |
| Subjects: | building materials, environmental behaviour, professional practice, construction operations, data collection methods, profession, design methods, environmental impact, environmental issues, decision analysis, design practice, Geography, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Site Management, Contract Administration, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here