Adapting traditional shelter for disaster mitigation and reconstruction: Experiences with community-based approaches

Schilderman, T (2004) Adapting traditional shelter for disaster mitigation and reconstruction: Experiences with community-based approaches. Building Research & Information, 32(5), pp. 414-426. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Natural disasters are on the increase, not so much because natural hazards are growing in number, but because poor people are becoming more vulnerable. Vulnerability is as important a cause of disasters as the physical events that trigger them. Poor people's vulnerability is often increased when development goes wrong. Thus, development is a contributing factor in the occurrence and scale of disasters. At the same time, disasters, when they happen, cause serious setbacks to development. To get out of the vicious circle, more attention will have to be paid to mitigation and tackling the causes of vulnerability. Formal approaches to mitigation, initiated mainly by the public sector, have often been inefficient and at times have left people more vulnerable. A successful alternative approach, community-based disaster mitigation, can reduce vulnerability by engaging popular approaches, local knowledge and social capital, whilst addressing their weaknesses. Some examples of community-based mitigation are derived as lessons: learn from the past, build relations with communities, encourage participation, involve local builders and artisans, build local capacity, document and share lessons, and influence formal education.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: developing countries; disaster mitigation; disaster resistance; natural disasters; participation; poverty; reconstruction projects; risk; shelter; sustainability; vulnerability
Index terms: social capital, builder, public sector, natural hazard, poverty, becoming, community-based, developing country, reconstruction, natural disaster, local knowledge, vulnerability, disaster mitigation, mitigation
Subjects: practitioner, sociology, building construction, environmental hazards, philosophical process, communities and social development, administrative law, financial risk, development economics
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Ethics, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here