Simulation and analysis of airborne cross-contamination routes due to the operation of building drainage and vent systems

Swaffield, J A and Jack, L B (2004) Simulation and analysis of airborne cross-contamination routes due to the operation of building drainage and vent systems. Building Research & Information, 32(6), pp. 451-467. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Recent concerns about the role of the drainage and vent systems installed in high-rise and other buildings in the possible spread of airborne contamination have highlighted the need for simulations capable of predicting system response when subject to multiple and random events. Such simulations would allow designers to predict the possible contamination routes established as a result of failures of the system, e.g. trap seal loss and/or the influence of dried-out traps. In addition, the simulations proposed would provide diagnostic tools in the event of cross-contamination. Mathematical solutions are used to simulate the system unsteady water and entrained airflows, and the application of these simulations to predict likely contamination routes. The AIRNET simulation is employed to represent the unsteady air and water down-flow conditions in the network, the associated propagation of air pressure transients and trap response. The simulation can provide a design and standards development tool as well as a forensic and diagnostic tool for the investigation of suspected cross-contamination. The simulations confirm that cross-contamination routes result from normal operation and random failure conditions, including system surcharge and trap depletion due to, for example, poor maintenance. It suggests that simulation predictions have an important role in ascertaining potential hazards, as well as a forensic role.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: airborne contamination; building operation; disease vectors; drainage design; drainage systems; modelling infection; public health; water seals; water traps
Index terms: propagation, investigation, drainage, public health, designer, depletion, modelling, building operation, contamination
Subjects: environmental resource management, analytical methods, profession, infrastructure and transport systems, engineering process, data collection methods, environmental health, management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here