Managing and interpreting uncertainty for climate change risk

White, R R (2004) Managing and interpreting uncertainty for climate change risk. Building Research & Information, 32(5), pp. 438-448. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Climate change is a significant risk for the built environment because it implies not only warmer weather, but also more extreme weather events, such as storms, droughts and heat waves. Considerable uncertainty about the future also exists, partly because of the response of society's apparent reluctance to mitigate climate change by reducing fossil fuel consumption. An adaptive response to the challenge draws on the literature on climate change, the urban environment, natural hazards and risk analysis. Two concepts - life cycle costs and the avoidance of ruin - provide a useful framework for factoring the uncertainty associated with climate change into a risk analysis for the built environment. Monitoring, prediction, data management and communication are the unglamorous underpinnings of a successful urban risk-management strategy. For cities to develop a significantly improved response capacity, the active support of senior levels of government is essential because cities have neither the legal powers nor the resources to tackle climate change on their own. Ultimately, the biggest challenges are institutional and behavioural.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; building stock; built environment; climate change; extreme weather; risk management; urban risk analysis; vulnerability
Index terms: society, building stock, built environment, drought, risk analysis, life cycle cost, weather, data management, natural hazard, monitoring, management strategy, urban environment, climate change, vulnerability, risk management, adaptation, extreme weather event, consumption, fossil fuel
Subjects: user focus, environmental hazards, communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, data management, energy systems, management, consumer economics, air quality, risk assessment, asset management, research methods, climate science, urban sustainability, control systems
Topics: Research Practice, Design Practice, Site Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here