Partnership in building energy performance contracting

Yik, F W H and Lee, W L (2004) Partnership in building energy performance contracting. Building Research & Information, 32(3), pp. 235-243. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Building energy performance contracting is a business strategy to assist building owners overcome the financial barriers for improving the energy performance of their buildings. In return for the investments made into the energy-saving measures, the energy service contractors would share with the building owners the energy cost saving. Although the contractual arrangement is meant to create a win-win situation, disappointments could arise due to mismatches between the expected and actual outcomes. From a micro-economics viewpoint, the key factors contributing to the failure of a building energy performance contract are reviewed. To solve the commonly encountered problems in building energy performance contracting, it is proposed the conventional performance contract is replaced with a partnership formed jointly by the building owner and the energy service contractor, with the latter assuming the role of the performance contractor. This would unite the goals of the two parties and cultivate genuine cooperation between them. The key features for this new contractual arrangement are described along with how this arrangement could resolve typical energy performance contracting problems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business models; cooperation; energy; energy service companies; energy savings; facilities management; performance contracting; sustainable development
Index terms: energy service company, cooperation, mismatch, energy performance, facilities management, business model, energy-saving, sustainable development, owner, business strategy, partnership, energy cost
Subjects: business, engineering problems, psychology, energy systems, management, health safety and environment, sociology, partnership management, cost management
Topics: Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here