Cicmil, S and Marshall, D (2005) Insights into collaboration at the project level: Complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building Research & Information, 33(6), pp. 523-535. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Drawing upon relevant concepts in organizational social theory (becoming ontology and processual view of complexity), and adopting an interpretative approach to studying organizational phenomena, this paper aims to make a contribution to the understanding of social processes in multi-organizational settings defined as 'construction projects'. The study takes a critical view on the claimed advantages of non-conventional, innovative project procurement strategies as integration-enhancing mechanisms at the project level. Taking a swimming pool construction project governed by an innovative procurement procedure known as 'two-stage tender' as a case in point, the paper evaluates the extent to which better project team integration has been achieved in this context. Two major concerns emerged from the case study analysis: (1) two-stage tendering is an incomplete solution to tensions, adversarial culture and a lack of genuine cooperation over time; and (2) there is a need for facilitating mechanisms of a different nature to support and sustain collective situated learning and shared understanding of longer-term benefits of collaborative work. Based on the theoretical considerations and the interpretation of the empirical accounts, the paper proposes and refines a conceptual framework for understanding the complexity of construction projects as social settings. In the light of this framework, alternative concepts and skills for enhanced collaborative interaction among participating parties in this kind of social setting are suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; complexity; construction project; interaction; management skills; organizational change; project dynamics; project management; team integration; two-stage tender |
| Index terms: | ontology, drawing, strategy, case study, social theory, becoming, organizational change, complexity, project management, social interaction, project procurement, project team, interaction, cooperation, conceptual framework, social process, integration, construction project, collaboration, dynamics |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, psychology, technical documentation, contractual arrangements, project delivery, management, education and knowledge transfer, theoretical framing, production management, social theory, project management theory and practice, organizational analysis, sociology, communities and social development, philosophical process, systems engineering, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here