Kisilewicz, T (2007) Computer simulation in solar architecture design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(2), pp. 106-123. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
There is a need today for simple design formulas that take into account the necessary building features and help to answer the question of how to minimize conventional heating demand and ensure comfort conditions. Even in moderate climates, high solar gains in low-energy buildings reduce heating demand but, at the same time, may significantly increase the overheating load. Broad simulation research (by means of Energy Plus™) covering almost 900 combinations in 4D space allowed the selection of local optimum points, resulting in an approximated design formula. An optimum south glazing index can be calculated on the basis of space heating demand and its thermal capacity, as well as the spectral and insulating features of the south glazing. The simple design formulas presented in this paper could be, at least in the Central European climate, a useful tool for the replacement of intuitive decisions with conscious and rational ones. The most important conclusion is that window sizing, usually performed in the first stage of architectural design, should follow rather than precede certain technical decisions. A precise but simple sizing method is crucial for energy consumption and the internal thermal environment. The proposed tool would allow the bridging of today's common gap between architectural design and engineering practice. It could also be adapted to other locations and climates after the necessary modifications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; direct passive solar gain; low-energy architecture; overheating; solar energy; thermal capacity |
| Index terms: | glazing, computer simulation, overheating, low-energy building, building design, solar energy, replacement, architectural design, thermal environment, comfort, space heating, window, energy consumption |
| Subjects: | mechanical systems, materials science, modelling and simulation, energy systems, architectural design, energy efficiency, architectural elements, design practice, occupational health and safety management, environmental engineering, thermal systems |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here