Ngowi, A B and Pienaar, E (2005) Trust factor in construction alliances. Building Research & Information, 33(3), pp. 267-278. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In any strategic alliance, there are cooperation and competition aspects between the parties involved. The propensity to pursue vigorously either of them depends on the confidence each party has that the partner(s) will not act opportunistically. A study in Botswana was undertaken to determine the role of trust on the propensity to pursue the competition aspect of the alliance. Using structured interviews on five construction alliances, it was found that the firms tended to pursue the competition aspect when trust between the partners was low, but strengthened the cooperation aspect when trust was high. It was concluded that if construction alliances are to achieve their principal aims, then the partners need to nurture a high level of trust between themselves. A framework for doing this is proposed and tested on a case study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Botswana; construction alliance; construction firm; opportunism; partnering; strategic alliance; trust |
| Index terms: | interview, Botswana, trust factor, opportunism, cooperation, construction firm, strategic alliance, competition, partnering, case study |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, market analysis, Geography, organization, partnership management, psychology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here