Burroughs, S (2006) Strength of compacted earth: Linking soil properties to stabilizers. Building Research & Information, 34(1), pp. 55-65. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The influence of stabilizers and soil properties on the strength of stabilized, compacted earth is investigated. This is achieved by establishing relationships between natural soil properties (two measures each of gradation and plasticity and one of shrinkage), stabilizer treatments (0-6% of lime and/or cement and/or asphalt), and stabilized unconfined compressive strength (UCS). A total of 219 strength tests were performed on 104 different soils. The soils can be categorized into two groups according to whether single soil properties or combinations of them are "favourable or "unfavourable in their predisposition to stabilization. The mean UCS for favourable soils ranges from 2.98-3.25 MPa (90%≥2 MPa) and for unfavourable soils from 2.32-2.48 MPa (60%≥2 MPa), having controlled for stabilizer treatment variation. Soil linear shrinkage is the best single discriminator of stabilization suitability based on the categorization results. In linear modelling (analysis of covariance), the UCS of favourable soils is a function of variation in soil properties but not of variation in the quantity of cement or lime used. Conversely, the UCS of unfavourable soils is a positive function of the quantity of stabilizer used. The results of the study stress the importance of selecting a soil whose characteristics are favourably predisposed to stabilization in order to attain satisfactory strengths of compacted earth. Future research should be aimed at developing a system that uses key soil properties to predict the likelihood of successful stabilization.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cement; compacted earth; compressive strength; lime; soil properties; stabilization |
| Index terms: | compressive strength, lime, variation, suitability, stabilization, modelling |
| Subjects: | design criteria, material analysis and testing, contractual condition, building materials, analytical methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here