Valuing labour

Clarke, L (2006) Valuing labour. Building Research & Information, 34(3), pp. 246-256. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The UK construction labour process rests on casual self-employment, output-based pay, rigid trade divisions, low levels of training, and a sharp divide between operative and professional/technical skills. Skill shortages beset the industry and their solution focuses not on employment regulation and a comprehensive industry-wide training scheme, but on importing the necessary skilled labour. It is demonstrated how qualitatively differently construction labour is valued in the UK compared with other leading European countries. These rely on higher skill levels, based on knowledge gained through the training process and on a more stable and collectively negotiated structure of training provision and employment. In the UK, in contrast, labour is not valued according to the knowledge it incorporates but according to an individual's ability to fulfil the task in hand. Training is geared to meeting individual employers' immediate needs; qualifications are not a prerequisite for entry; and labour is rewarded for its product not for its potential. The key features of the UK system that give rise to concern are identified. The ways the UK system needs to change are outlined in order to accommodate sustainable development of the construction process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: employee conditions; employment structure; human capital; labour; organizational culture; skills and training; social context; UK; vocational qualifications
Index terms: skilled labour, skill shortage, low level, qualification, human capital, technical skill, employment, sustainable development, construction labour, construction process, self-employment, regulation, organizational culture, operative
Subjects: business economics, measurement and scaling, sociology, building construction, political science, management, economics, educational resources, health safety and environment, professional development, practitioner
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Education, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Governance, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here