Measuring productivity in the construction industry

Crawford, P and Vogl, B (2006) Measuring productivity in the construction industry. Building Research & Information, 34(3), pp. 208-219. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of methods used to measure productivity in the construction industry. The advantages and disadvantages of average labour productivity and total factor productivity measures are discussed in detail, and the relationship between these two measures is established both theoretically and in an application at the industry level. The usefulness of any productivity measurement framework for policy-makers and industry practitioners alike depends crucially on the extent to which it enables the identification of the underlying drivers of productivity. This requirement necessitates an approach that involves formally describing the production process and explaining as much as possible of construction output in terms of the quantity and quality of inputs that are used to generate it. Whilst it is accepted that data requirements are a major constraint to such an approach, it is suggested that by establishing a robust measurement framework, data deficiencies can be defined more easily. Guidance on areas where improvements are needed is provided and it is considered that the focus of future research should be in creating new and improving existing datasets.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; labour productivity; production function; resource input measures; total factor productivity
Index terms: productivity, total factor productivity, production process, construction industry, dataset, construction output, practitioner, labour productivity
Subjects: production economics, practitioner, operations management, manufacturing engineering, management, industry analysis, data management
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here