Gormley, M and Campbell, D P (2006) Modelling water reduction effects: Method and implications for horizontal drainage. Building Research & Information, 34(2), pp. 131-144. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Waste solids in building drainage systems may still be considered as discrete, subject to a system of forces including hydrostatic, mass, buoyancy and frictional components. Recent water conservation proposals, including legislation, have led to the reduction in the quantities of water available to transport waste into the sewer, and have had a major impact on the hydraulics associated with the transportation of discrete solids in near horizontal drains in buildings. Current design practice, based on statistical methods, leads to oversized systems that present serious implications for system performance as reduced flows from appliances increase the risk of blockages occurring. The need for predictive techniques to inform appropriate stakeholders has never been greater. The development of a numerical model (DRAINET) to predict single solid or non-interacting solid transport has informed regulatory policy on pipe sizing and maintenance strategies. Further refinements of this modelling technique to include the interaction of solids, particularly in the deposition region under water conservation criteria, confirms that the complex interactions in drainage systems cannot be assessed using 'rule of thumb or statistical approaches. Previous research in this area has shown that, in general, above-ground drainage systems benefit from a reduction in pipe diameter to improve drain self-cleansing. The methods outlined in this paper confirm this recommendation and it is postulated that the process of solid transport is enhanced by the interaction of multiple solids, particularly in the region of deposition.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building drainage; mathematical modelling; method of characteristics; solid transport; water conservation |
| Index terms: | numerical model, strategy, water conservation, proposal, sewer, design practice, legislation, modelling, interaction, drainage, hydraulic, statistical method, mathematical modelling |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, legal systems, project planning, fluid mechanics, analytical methods, infrastructure and transport systems, occupational health, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, management, design process |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here