Ji, X L; Lou, W Z; Dai, Z Z; Wang, B G and Liu, S Y (2006) Predicting thermal comfort in Shanghai's non-air-conditioned buildings. Building Research & Information, 34(5), pp. 507-514. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The thermal comfort of people in naturally ventilated environments was examined in a field study in Shanghai, China, in which over 1814 office workers responded to a questionnaire while simultaneous physical measurements were taken. The paper explores whether it is justifiable to use the predicted mean vote (PMV) model to predict inhabitants' thermal sensations. Participants cast votes on standard subjective thermal rating scales and these were correlated with temperature indices that variously account for the thermal impacts of humidity, radiant temperature, air velocity and clothing levels. It was found that the actual mean thermal sensation is lower than the PMV, i.e. about 0.64PMV. The upper boundary of operative temperature is about 29°C which is outside of the current American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) standard comfort zone (ASHRAE 55-2004), but lower than the temperature of the upper 80% acceptable limit calculated using an adaptive model (30.1°C). This suggests that people residing in this hot area have adapted to its climate and their expectations for comfort allow them to endure heat better than expected.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive behaviour; expectation; natural ventilation; predicted mean vote; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | society, clothing, field study, thermal sensation, engineer, adaptive behaviour, Shanghai, thermal comfort, natural ventilation, questionnaire, comfort, adaptive model, operative, humidity, China |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, communities and social development, environmental engineering, research methods, Geography, profession, data collection methods, human factors, practitioner, climate science |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here