Component manufacturers' perceptions of managing innovation

Larsson, B; Sundqvist, J and Emmitt, S (2006) Component manufacturers' perceptions of managing innovation. Building Research & Information, 34(6), pp. 552-564. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The aim of this research is to understand component manufacturers' perception of their role in the innovation process. The role of the component manufacturer is different to other construction sector actors because they are product- not project-orientated. Base information was taken from part of a large benchmarking study conducted in Sweden. This helped to identify a small number of established component manufacturers located in a large geographical area of Sweden suitable for further investigation. Information about ten manufacturers was collected and interviews were conducted with their managing directors. The interviews revealed considerable variation in the manufacturers' perception of their position in the innovation process, their approach to new product development and interaction with their customers. Manufacturers were then graded according to their benchmarking and innovation procedures, which helped to illustrate a link between communication and information-sharing practices, benchmarking and innovation. The main findings are that the more innovative companies use information and benchmarking activities to their benefit. The more innovative companies have established a balance between innovations in process and product, have a clear direction from their managing director, and engage in regular communication with their customers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: complex product systems; component manufacturer; innovation; innovation leadership; innovation process; Sweden; technological progress
Index terms: interaction, construction sector, benchmarking, variation, new product development, managing innovation, investigation, innovative company, complex product system, Sweden, manufacturer, interview
Subjects: innovation and technology management, data collection methods, innovation studies, practitioner, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, performance measurement, Geography, contractual condition
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here