Lisø, K R; Hygen, H O; Kvande, T and Thue, J V (2006) Decay potential in wood structures using climate data. Building Research & Information, 34(6), pp. 546-551. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The relationship between building materials, structures and climate is complex and there is an urgent need for more accurate methods to assess building performance. For example, the lifetime of wooden cladding is strongly dependent on the local-level climatic impact. A national map of the potential for decay in wood structures in Norway is presented based on Scheffer's climate index formula. Weather data are used from 115 observing stations for the reference 30-year period 1961-90. The climate index distribution allows for geographically differentiated guidelines on protective measures. Detailed scenarios for climate change for selected locations in Norway are used to provide an indication of the possible future development of decay rates. Climate indices allowing for the quantitative assessment of building enclosure performance may be an important element in the development of adaptation measures to meet the future risks of climate change in different parts of the world. Established quantified relations between climatic impact and material behaviour or building performance can be used as a tool for the evaluation of the need for changes in functional requirements. The presented work represents an example of a first step towards such measures. Ways to improve the reliability of the index further are also suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building enclosure; building performance; climate adaptation; climate change; decay risk; Norway; wooden structures |
| Index terms: | Norway, adaptation, wood, building performance, enclosure, weather, cladding, climate change, building material, climate adaptation |
| Subjects: | building materials, climate science, user focus, air quality, quality assurance, Geography, traditional and composite building materials, architectural elements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Construction Materials, Geographical Context, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here