Defining absolute environmental limits for the built environment

Lowe, R (2006) Defining absolute environmental limits for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 34(4), pp. 405-415. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The question addressed is whether it is possible to define working limits on environmental impacts from the built environment in terms of global carrying capacity. The main focus is on energy-related impacts, since these are global and relatively well-understood. Four possible approaches to defining limits are explored: static equilibrium, asymptotic, integral of excess and planned future. The conclusions that emerge from this exploration are that global environmental constraints are very tight, but also that they are dynamically and strongly influenced by the trajectory of social and technological development over the coming century. Their use as the basis for practical, quantitative metrics of sustainability, therefore, involves a large measure of subjectivity. A fifth approach - the developmental approach - is identified, which instead of focusing on long-term external constraints to human activity, focuses instead on the internal, short- to medium-term dynamics of the built environment itself. It appears likely that the developmental approach, guided by qualitative conclusions from the analysis of global carrying capacity, is likely to be most fruitful.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building performance; building sustainability assessment; environmental assessment; environmental performance targets
Index terms: environmental performance, building performance, subjectivity, built environment, environmental impact, exploration, dynamics, building sustainability, human activity, environmental assessment
Subjects: environmental resource management, sustainability and energy, environmental impact, human factors and perception, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, quality assurance, systems engineering, sustainability assessment
Topics: Urban Studies, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here