Indoor environment quality contracts in building projects

Saari, A and Aalto, L (2006) Indoor environment quality contracts in building projects. Building Research & Information, 34(1), pp. 66-74. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The scientific literature is replete with examples that indicate that poor indoor conditions at workplaces reduce work performance and increase short-term sick leave. To address good indoor environment quality (IEQ), strategic and practical design decisions are needed in the early phase of the building process to ensure successful implementation. However, current procurement practices are hampered by fragmentation, long subcontract chains and vague performance requirements. A preliminary study is undertaken that focuses on developing a method of contracting that enables the attainment and verification of the desired IEQ. Using a review of international research and practices, existing commissioning methods and contract procedures are identified for their attention to IEQ. A contract procedure is proposed that fosters agreement on indoor environment between building owners and tenants, and which directs a building project to give users the guarantee of indoor condition. To make a pre-lease contract agreement that includes IEQ, the factors having an influence on the IEQ chain must be included in all building contracts such as those of design, purchase, and operation and maintenance. Thus, the requirements of IEQ require their incorporation into every phase of the building project. The main elements in these contracts, in addition to the requirements of IEQ, are those verifying quality, bonuses and sanctions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building construction; building performance; commissioning; contracts; design quality; indoor environment quality; predictability; project delivery; quality control
Index terms: owner, fragmentation, building performance, building construction, tenant, indoor environment, design quality, lease, operation and maintenance, subcontract, building contract, guarantee, implementation, quality control, building process, design decision, project delivery, work performance, commissioning
Subjects: maintenance engineering, land economics, contract structure, design practice, sociology, building construction, completion, quality assurance, business, contract type, practitioner, operations management, project delivery, contractual arrangements, environmental science, professional practice
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Site Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Project Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here