Sexton, M; Barrett, P and Aouad, G (2006) Motivating small construction companies to adopt new technology. Building Research & Information, 34(1), pp. 11-22. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Construction companies are increasingly being challenged to transfer and use new technology. However, little investigation has been undertaken on technology transfer from the perspective of the small construction company. A contribution to this underdeveloped area is based on results from an interview survey of seven small UK construction companies. The results stress that the technology which small construction companies tend to transfer more successfully is that which can contribute to the business in a quick, tangible fashion, and which can fit into existing organizational capabilities. Any technology that is too far removed from this 'comfort zone is seen to require too much investment and to contain too much risk, and thus tends to be intuitively and swiftly sifted out. This is in marked contrast to the relevant literature that depicts large companies operating in more complex networks, drawing upon them for new tacit and explicit technologies that support more long-term, formal technology strategies, and which often complement some form of specialized internal research and development capability. The implication for policy is that any technology transfer initiatives need to appreciate and actively manage the different motivations and capabilities of small and large construction companies to absorb and use new technology.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | innovation; organizational capabilities; small construction companies; small and medium sized enterprises; technology transfer; UK |
| Index terms: | research and development, new technology, interview, construction company, organizational capability, technology transfer, investigation, survey, comfort, drawing, motivation, technology strategy, small and medium sized enterprise |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, research management, innovation and technology management, psychology, occupational health and safety management, sociology, knowledge management, business, organization, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here