Energy efficiency and low-carbon technologies in urban renewal

Sunikka, M (2006) Energy efficiency and low-carbon technologies in urban renewal. Building Research & Information, 34(6), pp. 521-533. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Buildings belong to the most cost-effective sectors where carbon dioxide (CO2) reductions can be achieved, and urban regeneration offers a good intervention point for switching to sustainable fuel sources, as changes in energy infrastructure can be coupled with other construction, thus decreasing the cost. However, the potential energy savings that are feasible do not match the more ambitious policy targets. Based on case studies in the Netherlands, obstacles are identified in the context of urban renewal that need to be overcome if energy efficiency measures are to be implemented and space heating replaced with low-carbon technologies. The current free-market public policy instruments have not managed to address the obstacles identified in the case studies due to poor market signals, costs and payback periods, risks, and a lack of leadership on environmental targets and policies on sustainable urban renewal. The potential for stronger government intervention is examined for the effectiveness in reducing both energy consumption and CO2 generation. Legislation could produce a certain policy outcome in terms of CO2 reduction in urban renewal in the Netherlands if compliance and legitimacy are ensured, but policy consideration is also required to account for the dilemma of low-income households and the rebound effects associated with occupant behaviours.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; carbon reduction; energy efficiency; housing; public policy; renovation; the Netherlands; urban renewal
Index terms: space heating, effectiveness, urban renewal, payback, energy-saving, household, energy consumption, income, renovation, energy efficiency measure, housing, legitimacy, occupant behaviour, urban regeneration, public policy, carbon reduction, CO2 emissions, case study, energy efficiency, legislation, compliance, environmental target, rebound effect, Netherlands, carbon dioxide, building stock
Subjects: sustainability and energy, public policy, energy systems, legal systems, economic analysis, construction type, data collection methods, mechanical systems, health behaviours and lifestyles, climate science, demography, sociology, asset management, sustainability assessment, renovation and retrofit, post-disaster and reconstruction, performance management, Geography, health safety and environment
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here