Banfill, P F G and Peacock, A D (2007) Energy-efficient new housing: the UK reaches for sustainability. Building Research & Information, 35(4), pp. 426-436. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A critique is presented of recent proposals by the UK government to require new housing to become progressively more energy efficient, leading to net zero-carbon dioxide emissions from 2016. It is implied that these zero-carbon homes will involve a range of on-site power generation, and the technological changes needed to achieve this are discussed. Achieving zero-carbon space and water heating presents a distinct set of infrastructural challenges to the industry. However, proven and demonstrated technologies exist that, if deployed correctly, could achieve this goal. In contrast, the provision of zero net carbon electrical power to homes presents technological demands. It will require substantial advancement of current technological concepts, coupled to infrastructural change in the UK electricity supply industry, to be successful. Careful consideration should be given to the scale of the electricity-generating technologies proposed to ensure that the lowest cost and risk pathways are identified. It is not clear in the legislation proposed that these pathways will be sought.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon dioxide emissions; house building; renewable energy; zero-carbon homes |
| Index terms: | net zero, legislation, critique, housing, renewable energy, lowest cost, technological change, power generation, carbon dioxide emission, proposal |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, legal systems, bidding, construction type, climate science, innovation studies, project planning, energy systems |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Procurement, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here