Professional ethics in the South African construction industry

Bowen, P; Pearl, R and Akintoye, A (2007) Professional ethics in the South African construction industry. Building Research & Information, 35(2), pp. 189-205. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Professional codes of conduct have developed to reflect the parameters of normative behaviour within which members of the professions should operate. The professional responsibilities and obligations of members toward their peers, their clients and the general public are usually delineated within these codes of conduct. An overview of business and professional ethics within construction is provided and the ethical issues facing South African construction professions are summarized. Specifically, this paper addresses ethical issues with regard to the breach of professional responsibilities and obligations to clients and the general public, as evidenced from a questionnaire survey of architects, contractors, quantity surveyors and consulting engineers. The survey findings indicate that, notwithstanding noticeable breaches, the professions take their responsibilities and obligations seriously, and regard a balance between their obligations to clients and the general public as paramount. Breaches in professional responsibilities include conflicts of interest and the divulging of confidential and proprietary information to a third party; both professionals and clients are guilty of such breaches.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architects; business ethics; codes of conduct; consulting engineers; ethics; personal ethics; professional ethics; professional responsibility; quantity surveyors; South Africa
Index terms: questionnaire, architect, profession, South Africa, construction industry, quantity surveying, conflicts of interest, professional ethics, survey, business ethics, ethics, consulting engineer
Subjects: professional ethics, industry analysis, Geography, professional practice, ethical practice, data collection methods, profession, institututions
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Ethics
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here