Eppler, M J (2007) Toward a visual turn in collaboration analysis? Building Research & Information, 35(5), pp. 584-587. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The significance of the visual perspective on collaboration is that it offers tremendous potential and variety. Collaboration is probably not limited to the area of design which is the context of the Building Research Information special issue on 'Visual Practices: Images of Knowledge Work' (2007), but also for areas where collaborative drawings do not necessarily represent tangible objects. The rich and close descriptions of the use and appropriation of visual artefacts reveal that images help groups to focus attention, to surface areas of agreement and disagreement, to make implicit knowledge and past experiences explicit, to discover new perspectives, and to document or revise decisions. The empirical accounts documented in the special issue also show that there is still much to learn about how joint visual structures facilitate (or impede) group cognition and deliberation. Several future challenges are highlighted. First, to enable theory-building in the fragmented visual practices domain, research will need to be collected from diverse fields of knowledge. Second, an extended classification of visual boundary objects is need, for example, based on the examples gathered in the special issue papers. Third, research is needed to understand which set of attributes matches with which type of collaboration task. Fourth, broadening the scope of graphic formats that are used as boundary objects is another promising research area for the study of visual practices. Finally, the negative or dysfunctional side merits research: what are the disadvantages and risks of visual practices?
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | boundary objects; collaboration; communication; graphic format; knowledge exchange; visual practices |
| Index terms: | artefact, collaboration, cognition, knowledge exchange, building research, boundary object, drawing |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, knowledge management, management, research management, sociology, cognitive psychology, collaborative management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here