Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation

Lützkendorf, T and Lorenz, D (2007) Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation. Building Research & Information, 35(6), pp. 644-661. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

One way to increase the demand for sustainable buildings is through the description, assessment, and communication of their economic advantages and reduced risks in comparison with conventional buildings. These benefits can also be expressed through favourable lending and insurance conditions. However, a precondition is the integration of sustainability issues into the processes used by the financial and insurance industries for assessing property assets (e.g. risk assessment, rating, and valuation). Thus, the valuation and property rating process itself and those involved with it have a key role. Due to new international banking capital adequacy rules (Basel II), property rating and risk assessment systems are being further developed and implemented by a number of European banks. To some extent, these systems already contain direct or indirect approaches for integrating sustainability issues. Test-ratings reveal banks' existing methodologies, instruments, and criteria for assessing property assets (as well as their cash flow generation) can be harnessed to express and communicate the advantages and benefits of sustainable buildings. The inclusion of sustainability-related rating criteria sends out an important signal to the property market and holds a huge potential for market transformation. However, the property-rating process should be linked more closely to and underpinned by the results of existing assessment methods and instruments developed by the sustainable building community.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: banking; basel ii; lending conditions; market transformation; property rating; property risk assessment; property valuation; sustainable building
Index terms: property market, banking, cash flow, risk assessment, sustainable building, insurance, integration, methodology, market transformation
Subjects: research methods, financial management, sustainable construction, financial risk, organizational analysis, economic and policy analysis, real estate economics, economic analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here