Nelms, C E; Russell, A D and Lence, B J (2007) Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies: A framework and its application. Building Research & Information, 35(3), pp. 237-251. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A recently developed framework to provide a logical structure for the a priori assessment of a particular technology with regard to sustainability concepts, performance, and relevancy to a project's construction process and operation is introduced. The framework is designed to assist project stakeholders and policy-makers in systematically identifying and evaluating the implications and relative merits of a range of alternative sustainable technologies. Building professionals were consulted throughout the development of the framework: to test the completeness of the framework; to capture the value systems of various industry participants in order to reflect them in the framework; and to gather information on the advantages and disadvantages of the green roof technology. The framework is applied to the example of the green roof technology, and the order-of-magnitude estimates are developed for performance measures identified as important from the perspective of industry professionals. The technology is evaluated for different configurations of the same building type to demonstrate the effect of building context on performance. The framework can be used to assist in the assessment of the positive and negative implications of a particular technology with respect to value systems and context, and, therefore, may be used to explain market behaviour, assist policy-makers in developing meaningful regulations and incentives, and provide feedback regarding a new technology in an objective manner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green roofs; performance measures; risk management; stakeholder involvement; sustainable development; sustainable technology; technology assessment |
| Index terms: | green roof, risk management, building professional, sustainable development, regulation, performance measure, new technology, stakeholder involvement, configuration, project stakeholder, technology assessment, estimate, construction process |
| Subjects: | participation process, systems engineering, health safety and environment, performance measurement, financial and cost management, innovation and technology management, sociology, political science, building construction, sustainable design, profession, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Site Management, Governance, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here