Pearlmutter, D; Freidin, C and Huberman, N (2007) Alternative materials for desert buildings: A comparative life cycle energy analysis. Building Research & Information, 35(2), pp. 144-155. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This study examines the potential life-cycle energy savings that may be achieved by combining an innovative alternative building material and a bioclimatic approach to building design under the distinctive environmental conditions of a desert region. A residential building in the Negev region of Israel is used as a model for the assessment. Designed with a number of climatically-responsive design strategies and conventional concrete-based materials, the building was energy-independent in terms of summer cooling and had only modest requirements for winter heating. As a second step to the assessment, the integration of an alternative building material based on industrial waste and local raw materials in the building's walls was considered through thermal simulation. The alternative materials are produced through a process developed to make productive utilization of fly-ash from oil shale and coal combustion. Material properties were analyzed using laboratory specimens, and it was established that high-quality building components could be produced using the developed technological procedure with standard manufacturing equipment. The consumption of both embodied and operational energy was analyzed over the building's useful life span, and this life-cycle analysis showed the clear advantage of integrating alternative materials in a building under environmental conditions in a desert environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alternative materials; climatic design; desert; embodied energy; energy efficiency; life cycle analysis |
| Index terms: | material property, residential building, industrial waste, alternative material, Israel, laboratory, embodied energy, winter, life cycle energy, building component, environmental conditions, life cycle analysis, energy efficiency, building design, integration, consumption, design strategy, energy-saving, summer, building material |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, organizational analysis, environmental science, energy systems, architectural elements, climate science, research management, building materials, Geography, architectural design, waste management, material properties and characteristics, materials science, design methods, sustainability and energy, consumer economics, construction type |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here