Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning

Schultmann, F and Sunke, N (2007) Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning. Building Research & Information, 35(6), pp. 602-615. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The reduction of waste through the establishment of closed-loop material flows has an important role in creating a more sustainable built environment. Especially in deconstruction projects, participants could take advantage of the application of waste management and recovery strategies while adhering to the principle of 'sustainable construction'. The opportunity for materials recovery depends on the type of deconstruction technique applied at a building's end-of-life. An integrated deconstruction-recovery planning approach for deconstruction projects is developed to include ecological as well as economic benefits. This planning approach is an extension of the multi-mode resource-constrained project-scheduling problem (MMRCPSP) from operations research. Although the general MMRCPSP considers time- and resource-resource trade-offs, the proposed extension incorporates energy-time-resource trade-offs. The energy-time-resource trade-offs reflect the realization of energy savings or costs over the life cycle of a building. Based on a life cycle energy analysis, recovery options can be selected for deconstructed components and materials dependent on the chosen deconstruction techniques (e.g. demolition, selective deconstruction, manual deconstruction, and deconstruction using various resources).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction and demolition waste; deconstruction; life cycle; material recovery; project planning; recycling
Index terms: built environment, waste management, energy-saving, option, project planning, life cycle energy, operations research, scheduling, sustainable construction, recovery, recycling, life cycle, material recovery, construction and demolition, strategy
Subjects: sustainable construction, sustainable design, management, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, control systems, design methods, value management, waste management, energy systems, operations research, operations management
Topics: Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here