Fuller, R J (2004) Operating experiences with an advanced fabric energy storage system. Construction Economics and Building, 4(2), pp. 1-10. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Despite their proven track record in the cold climate countries of northern Europe, there are no reports in the research literature of experiences using advanced fabric energy storage (FES) systems in countries where cooling rather than heating is the main priority. This paper reports some of the experiences with the first known advanced FES system in Australia made over the first full calendar year of operation. It is located in a three-storey building on a university campus in Victoria and has been in operation since mid-2002. Temperature, energy use and operational mode data were recorded during 2003. Airflow measurements through the FES system have been made in five areas of the building. On-going operating problems still exist with the system and this has prevented a conclusive evaluation of its suitability for the southern Australian climate.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cooling; energy use; fabric energy storage; heating; ventilation |
| Index terms: | cold climate, Victoria, ventilation, energy storage, Europe, energy use, energy storage system, Australia, suitability |
| Subjects: | climate science, physical geography and landforms, energy systems, design criteria, regions and continents, air quality, Geography |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here