Forum: Informing LEED's next generation with the natural step

Zimmerman, A and Kibert, C J (2007) Forum: Informing LEED's next generation with the natural step. Building Research & Information, 35(6), pp. 681-689. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Building assessment systems, such as the US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) suite of standards, have been helpful in the initiation of a movement that is addressing the environmental impact of buildings. The approach utilized in these standards is in need of updating in order to address a number of potentially serious shortcomings. Among these are the lack of a quantifiable relationship between 'points' and environmental impacts, a 'one-size-fits-all' design for assessment, and an absence of consistent science underpinning LEED points. To address the last of these shortcomings, the potential use of The Natural Step (TNS) could form the foundation for the next generation of building assessment tools, sometimes referred to as LEED Version 3. LEED is used as an example of the potential application of TNS to remedy some of the major shortcomings of building assessment systems. The same approach would apply to voluntary, market-based building assessment systems used in other countries, e.g. the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), the Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE), and Green Star, to name but a few.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 'green'; buildings; environmental assessment methods; environmental indicators; life-cycle assessment; sustainable building
Index terms: building assessment, green building, science, environmental impact, environmental assessment, movement, sustainable building, efficiency, environmental design, BREEAM accreditation, building research
Subjects: health behaviours and lifestyles, design practice, environmental policy, sustainability and energy, sustainable construction, specialized education, environmental impact, performance management, research management, asset management
Topics: Quality Management, Business Strategy, Education, Sustainability, Design Practice, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here