An intuitive daylighting performance analysis and optimization approach

Andersen, M; Kleindienst, S; Yi, L; Lee, J; Bodart, M and Cutler, B (2008) An intuitive daylighting performance analysis and optimization approach. Building Research & Information, 36(6), pp. 593-607. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The effective integration of daylighting considerations into the design process requires many issues to be considered simultaneously, such as daily and seasonal variations, illumination, and thermal comfort. To address the need for early integration into the design process, a new approach called Lightsolve has been developed. Its key objectives are to support the design process using a goal-oriented approach based on iterative design improvement suggestions; to provide climate-based annual metrics in a visual and synthesized format; and to relate quantitative and qualitative performance criteria using daylighting analysis data in various forms. This methodology includes the development of a time-segmentation process to represent weather and time in a condensed form, the adaptation of daylight metrics that encompass temporal and spatial considerations, and the creation of an interactive analysis interface to explore design options and design iterations. This system relies on optimization techniques to generate these suggestions. Lightsolve allows the designer to explore other design alternatives that may better fulfil the objectives and to learn about appropriate strategies to resolve daylight or sunlight penetration issues. It offers architects and building engineers support for daylighting design that can be employed interactively within the existing design process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: daylighting; design process; design support; energy; interactive optimization; simulation; visualization
Index terms: performance analysis, integration, methodology, architect, thermal comfort, penetration, visualization, seasonal variation, weather, option, performance criteria, sunlight, optimization technique, design process, strategy, engineer, daylighting, adaptation, designer
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, renewable energy, climate science, design methods, profession, air quality, user focus, environmental engineering, organizational analysis, market analysis, building performance, decision analysis, management, design practice, performance measurement, algorithms, research methods
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here