Carter, D J (2008) Tubular guidance systems for daylight: UK case studies. Building Research & Information, 36(5), pp. 520-535. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Tubular daylight guidance systems (TDGS) are linear devices that channel daylight into the core of a building. The experience of some of the first uses of TDGS is explored in actual buildings in UK temperate latitudes. The nature of the systems and the factors influencing the costs and various benefits that contribute value are identified. Lighting systems in working offices, lit by electric lighting and daylight guidance, were surveyed. Data on the physical characteristics of the systems, lighting conditions achieved, and user views were collected. The results formed the input to a cost and value analysis which permitted the economic limits of the systems to be evaluated. A number of daylight and environmental benefits were identified as value items, but the systems were clearly uneconomic in cost terms as presently configured and used. Long-term cost-value was compared with electric lighting alternatives making assumptions about future energy costs and system configurations. Some pitfalls of attempting to integrate innovative technology into existing lighting systems are identified and remedies suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alternative technologies; daylight; feedback; guidance systems; light pipes; lighting systems; office design; technology assessment; value |
| Index terms: | office design, physical characteristic, configuration, latitude, value analysis, technology assessment, energy cost, alternative technology, case study |
| Subjects: | geographical data, cost management, systems engineering, financial analysis, specialized design, material properties and characteristics, factor and component analysis, innovation and technology management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here