Cole, R J; Robinson, J; Brown, Z and O'Shea, M (2008) Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort. Building Research & Information, 36(4), pp. 323-336. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
To what extent can the urgency of climate change and an evolving concept of agency (at the individual and social levels of building users) create a new context for rethinking the notion of comfort? A new, emerging notion of comfort is explored that embraces engagement with new conditions, new experiences, and new types of interactions between inhabitants and building systems and unfamiliar technologies. The emphasis is on communication and dialogue as two dynamic and adaptive processes necessary to achieve optimal building performance while valuing and responding to inhabitant knowledge and agency, and enhancing indoor environmental quality from the standpoint of the inhabitants. A primary conclusion is that the goal of shifting into a lower carbon society has created a new context for comfort, from its conventional emphasis as automated, uniform and predictable, to a broader notion that takes into consideration dynamic, integrated, and participatory aspects. The key dimensions of this emergent broader view of comfort are examined and the relationships between them revealed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive behaviour; agency; climate change; comfort; communication; dialogue; energy demand; indoor environmental quality; inhabitant; occupant; social interaction; sustainable development; workplace |
| Index terms: | adaptive behaviour, building system, agency, social interaction, dimension, climate change, indoor environmental quality, sustainable development, comfort, building performance, society, interaction, energy demand |
| Subjects: | human factors, quality assurance, communities and social development, climate science, health monitoring assessment and metrics, engineering systems, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, sociology, energy systems, health safety and environment, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here