Gaspar, P L and De Brito, J (2008) Service life estimation of cement-rendered facades. Building Research & Information, 36(1), pp. 44-55. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Factorial methods are cost-effective, quick and easy-to-implement methodologies for service life estimation of buildings and their parts. They also stand as the underlying principle of the International Standard Organisation ISO-15686 for service life planning. However, few guidelines exist on how to relate real-life deterioration phenomena to quantified durability values for use within factorial methods. This paper describes a methodology to quantify the 'reference service life' and its modifying durability factors for cement-rendered facades based on fieldwork data of 150 cases located in Portugal. The methodology proposed relies on regression analysis of the overall degradation level of the cases assessed. The results obtained are used as a reference set of data for the statistical benchmarking of five different scenarios for the quantification of modifying durability factors of cement-rendered facades. Although the values obtained relate to a specific building element and material, on the one hand, and reflect the Portuguese construction context, on the other hand, the proposed methodology may be applied to other materials and elements in different building and environmental contexts, thus providing a guideline for the quantification of durability factors for use within the factor method.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | durability factors; facades; factor method; modifying factors; reference service life; rendering |
| Index terms: | Portugal, estimation, durability, degradation, ISO, quantification, deterioration, service life, benchmarking, regression analysis, methodology |
| Subjects: | standards development, material degradation and durability, financial and cost management, asset management, measurement and scaling, statistical analysis, performance measurement, research methods, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here