Neighbourhood design and physical activity

Lee, C and Moudon, A V (2008) Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Building Research & Information, 36(5), pp. 395-411. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Health problems related to physical inactivity have become a global health challenge affecting people from the full spectrum of income, age, and ethnicity. This paper examines if neighbourhood environments are associated with physical activity, especially walking and cycling. It analyses 608 respondent survey data from Washington State in the US and Geographic Information System-derived measures of the neighbourhood environment. Respondents reported traffic volume to be the most significant barrier, and good lighting to be the most important facilitator of walking and cycling. Utilitarian destinations, such as grocery stores, restaurants, retail stores and convenience stores, were significant correlates of walking and moderate-intensity physical activities, while housing type, sports facility and transportation infrastructure were correlated with vigorous physical activities. Active people rated higher for their neighbourhood attributes including safety, visual quality, knowing neighbours, seeing many other people walking and cycling, and the availability of sports facilities, parks, and bike racks. Simple interventions such as street lighting, pavements/sidewalks, street trees, benches, bike lanes or trails, bike racks, and traffic-calming devices appeared to hold some promise in promoting physical activities in neighbourhoods. Long-term solutions should include strategies to enhance overall aesthetics, safety, accessibility, street connectivity, and social interactions among neighbours.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: active living; built environment; cycling; design; health; neighbourhood; physical activity; public health; spatial configuration; urban design; walking; well-being
Index terms: street lighting, built environment, income, physical activity, well-being, transportation infrastructure, neighbourhood design, housing, social interaction, geographic information system, spatial configuration, urban design, connectivity, accessibility, facilitator, survey, public health, strategy, aesthetic
Subjects: urban design, inclusive design, factor and component analysis, management, environmental health, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, geographical techniques and analysis, networking, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, mental health and wellbeing, construction type, data collection methods, architectural design, economic analysis
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here