Environmental rating methods: Selecting indoor environmental quality (IEQ) aspects and indicators

Malmqvist, T (2008) Environmental rating methods: Selecting indoor environmental quality (IEQ) aspects and indicators. Building Research & Information, 36(5), pp. 466-485. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

It is often unclear whether environmental rating methods for buildings assess the most significant environmental aspects or if other considerations lie behind the choice of assessment aspects in specific methods. In the development of a comprehensive Swedish environmental rating method for buildings, a number of approaches for selecting environmental aspects in a method were tested. These include basing the selection on the severity and extent of problems, on official objectives, on mandatory rules, and on current practice. Once aspects, or rather building-related health problems, are selected, possible indicators for monitoring these problems can be tested with regard to theoretical and practical criteria in order to understand better the strengths and limitations of different indicators. The analyses in the paper are limited to indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and thus cover extensive reviews of current IEQ methods, Swedish objectives, and legislation as well as the severity and extent of IEQ problems. The results show that depending on the chosen approach, different numbers of aspects turn out to be significant. The approaches for prioritizing aspects suggested here can be used, preferably in combination. An aspect can be seen as motivated for inclusion in a method if many of the approaches suggest its significance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building assessment; building characteristics; environmental assessment; environmental indicators; environmental performance; environmental rating; health; indoor environmental quality; noise
Index terms: legislation, environmental performance, building assessment, prioritizing, monitoring, indoor environmental quality, environmental assessment
Subjects: asset management, decision analysis, environmental health, sustainability assessment, legal systems, environmental impact, control systems
Topics: Legal Issues, Site Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here