Pan, W; Gibb, A G F and Dainty, A R J (2008) Leading UK housebuilders' utilization of offsite construction methods. Building Research & Information, 36(1), pp. 56-67. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In recent years the construction industry has been exhorted to increase its utilization of offsite technologies, or 'Modern Methods of Construction' (MMC), in order to address the under-supply and poor build quality of housing. Despite the well-rehearsed benefits of such technologies, the take-up within the industry has been slow. This paper reports on research that examined housebuilders' practices and strategies regarding the use of offsite-MMC. A questionnaire survey of the top 100 housebuilders in the UK and a series of interviews were used to reveal the extent to which such technologies are being utilized and the factors which impinge on their popularity. The findings suggest that current offsite-MMC usage in large housebuilders is low, but that the level is likely to increase, given the pressures to improve quality, time, cost, productivity, and health and safety. The wider take-up of offsite-MMC is, however, inhibited by perceived higher capital costs, interfacing problems, long lead-in time, delayed planning process, and current manufacturing capacity. Based on these findings, the paper provides a set of strategies for improving offsite-MMC practices amongst housebuilders. It is hoped that will help deliver an improvement of housing supply in the UK.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; housebuilding; innovation; manufacturing; modern methods of construction; offsite; UK |
| Index terms: | housebuilding, housing, construction industry, questionnaire, survey, housebuilder, construction method, strategy, productivity, capital cost, health and safety, modern methods of construction, planning process, interview |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, project controls, building construction, health safety and environment, management, accounting and finance, construction integration, practitioner, construction type, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here