Ryu, S R; Rhee, K N; Yeo, M S and Kim, K W (2008) Strategies for flow rate balancing in radiant floor heating systems. Building Research & Information, 36(6), pp. 625-637. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Flow rate balancing makes it possible to provide each zone with a design flow rate and to meet the heating load in a radiant floor heating system. Even though the control device of the heating system works well, insufficient water flow rates can degrade control performance and thermal comfort. The water flow rate should be adjusted appropriately to cope with the heating load of each zone. This study analyzes the effect of flow rate balancing upon indoor climate and thermal comfort in a radiant floor heating system through field survey and computer simulations. The results indicate that an increase in the dwelling floor area coincides with a more excessive uneven distribution of flow rate. As the gross floor area of the sample houses increases, the necessity of flow rate balancing for each zone becomes more crucial. An analysis was performed for additional hydraulic problems caused by hydronic devices such as header, valve, etc., and possible strategies to maintain the optimal flow-rate inside the pipes in a radiant floor heating system were suggested. Under part-load conditions the use of a dynamic balancing valve is a more effective method to prevent a cavitation as it reduces the pressure drop across a balancing valve.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cavitation; flow rate; hydronic balancing; Korea; radiant floor heating; residential buildings; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | pressure drop, heating load, gross floor area, valve, residential building, heating system, strategy, thermal comfort, computer simulation, survey, indoor climate, hydraulic |
| Subjects: | energy systems, environmental science, management, fluid mechanics, control systems, modelling and simulation, building performance, data collection methods, environmental engineering, construction type |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here