Tombesi, P (2008) Out of what? Locating the underpinnings of theory. Building Research & Information, 36(6), pp. 668-673. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The Building Research and Information special issue 'Developing Theories of the Built Environment' (volume 36(3), 2008) explores the epistemology that underpins the creation of theory. It broadens the perspectives that typically escape the cone of vision of building studies, and thus tend to be ignored by most 'technical' experts in construction or urban development. This commentary raises and examines several implicit challenges that emerge from attempting to construct theory: defining the function of theory itself; what purposes it is being asked to serve; the underlying analytical basis for a theory; its intellectual coherence and the capability to connect disparate environmental, social, political and economic dimensions; and the problems associated with theory-building at the empirical level. An innovative solution might be to approach the problem from the opposite end: as data building. This would provide a fresh insight into the act of conceiving, negotiating and bringing a building artefact into being, as well as gauge the distance between the reality of practice and the aspirations of theory. Directing such a strategic focus at project level could allow for competing logics to inform decisions; for results to be teased out, normalized and assessed; and for bridging conceptual differences in the scope of analysis or the quantification of benefits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; conceptual frameworks; design research; epistemology; practical wisdom; production; theory-building |
| Index terms: | quantification, building research, coherence, built environment, negotiating, artefact, urban development, escape, dimension, epistemology, conceptual framework |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, urban design, emergency and crisis management, research management, sociology, measurement and scaling, conflict resolution, infrastructure and transport systems, human factors and perception, knowledge theory, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here