The dynamics of actors' and stakeholders' participation: An approach of management by design

de Blois, M and De Coninck, P (2008) The dynamics of actors' and stakeholders' participation: An approach of management by design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 4(3-4), pp. 176-188. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Design thinking (Owen, 2005), articulated around systems thinking, facilitates the definition of complex issues in a sustainable way, in which all actors and stakeholders (AS) play a predominant role. Innovative procedures, such as 'management by design', highlight the role of AS in structuring the project from and through the design process. Consequently, management by design requires revision of the dynamics of actors' and stakeholders' participation (ASP). Comparing the differences between the traditional approach to project development (which focuses on the organized project) and the project as an organizing process (which focuses on the organizing project) shows the advantages of design thinking for improving the ASP. This comparison requires the review of common theories, such as the organization as a dynamic process and the notion of project itself. However, despite all the advantages of ASP, this comparison demonstrates that their involvement includes multiple, unstable, evolving and potentially conflicting roles throughout the project process. The introduced notion of the 'organizing project' is conceived as a 'social actions construct'. It allows for a complementary and more global vision of the project. It highlights elements and stakes otherwise hidden in the traditional 'organized project' perspective.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: actors' and stakeholders' participation; design thinking; management by design; organizing project; project grounded research; project management
Index terms: dynamics, project management, project development, systems thinking, design process
Subjects: analytical methods, project delivery, design methods, systems engineering, project management theory and practice
Topics: Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here