The built environment through the cultural-architectural lens

Wang, W (2008) The built environment through the cultural-architectural lens. Building Research & Information, 36(6), pp. 674-676. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The Building Research and Information special issue 'Developing Theories on the Built Environment' (36(3) 2008) raises the question of whether there could be a common framework to combine a wide range of interests and provide insightful answers. This commentary explores the significance of cultural contexts for theories on the built environment. Deficiencies in both architectural theory and history have left cultural associations and values inarticulated. Increasingly, architectural theory and history have become marginalized in the widening debate about the built environment as their focus has become too limited and separated from everyday and urgent needs. The cultural 'footprint' remains the strongest force and determines patterns of behaviour and expectations. It is argued that a cultural lens is the primary key in providing both insight into an ideal and consciousness of (intellectual and practical) habits influencing our actions. In order to grasp the complexity of the built environment and provide a useful model for altering our collective actions, it is vital to study the transformational chains, for example, from the cultural to the ecological.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural theory; built environment; conceptual frameworks; practical wisdom; theorizing; theory-building
Index terms: built environment, complexity, architectural theory, habit, consciousness, history, theorizing, conceptual framework, building research, collective action
Subjects: research management, architectural and construction history, architectural theory, systems engineering, human factors and perception, health behaviours and lifestyles, theoretical framing, communities and social development, data science, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 CTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here