Yang, W and Kohler, N (2008) Simulation of the evolution of the Chinese building and infrastructure stock. Building Research & Information, 36(1), pp. 1-19. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
During China's rapid urbanization and modernization process, the energy and mass flows as well as the related environmental impacts of the Chinese building and infrastructure stocks deserve attention due to the high volume of construction activity, the possibly short lifespan of the new constructions, and the increasing need for energy and construction materials, which have already led to severe environmental impacts. The objective of this study is to model the energy and material input and output through the construction and operation activities in the reference year (2005) to estimate future development during the ongoing urbanization process (until 2050) under present conditions (Trend scenario) and to formulate alternative scenarios with reduced resource consumption and environmental impacts. An integrated life cycle assessment (LCA) model is proposed by taking into account the material and energy flows and the related environmental impacts through a combined bottom-up and top-down approach. The historical evolution from 1978 to 2005 is analysed as a basis for the forecasting projections. The different age classes of the stock are modelled as cohorts classified by use and by type (urban/rural). The transitions of the key parameters follow a logistic function. The results show the possibilities and limitations of alternative long-term developments. The limitations of the model both in structure and input data are discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; China; infrastructure stock; life cycle analysis; resource consumption; sustainability; trend analysis |
| Index terms: | resource consumption, China, estimate, construction material, evolution, environmental impact, life cycle analysis, life cycle assessment, construction activity, building stock, urbanization, forecasting, lifespan |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, environmental resource management, building materials, urban planning, prediction and forecasting, material degradation and durability, financial and cost management, environmental science, construction operations, Geography, asset management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here