Towards a very low-energy building stock: Modelling the US commercial building sector to support policy and innovation planning

Coffey, B; Borgeson, S; Selkowitz, S; Apte, J; Mathew, P and Haves, P (2009) Towards a very low-energy building stock: Modelling the US commercial building sector to support policy and innovation planning. Building Research & Information, 37(5-6), pp. 610-624. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The origin, structure and continuing development of a model of time-varying energy consumption in the US commercial building stock is described. The model is based on a flexible structure that disaggregates the stock into various categories (e.g. by building type, climate, vintage and life cycle stage) and with attributes assigned to each of these (e.g. floor area and energy-use intensity by fuel type and end use) based on historical data and user-defined scenarios for future projections. In addition to supporting the interactive exploration of building stock dynamics, the model has been used to study the likely outcomes of specific policy and innovation scenarios targeting very low future energy consumption in the building stock. Model use has highlighted the scale of the challenge of meeting targets stated by various government and professional bodies, and the importance of considering both new construction and existing buildings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building stock; climate change; efficiency; emissions; energy; low energy; new construction; planning; renovation; retrofit
Index terms: life cycle, building stock, energy-use intensity, efficiency, low-energy building, low energy, modelling, climate change, dynamics, energy consumption, renovation, exploration, commercial building
Subjects: asset management, systems engineering, performance management, renovation and retrofit, energy efficiency, environmental resource management, analytical methods, energy systems, construction type, value management, climate science
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here